![]() ![]() if you select the name of a note (maybe after a quick search) and do a CTRL+C you will copy the actual content, you can select a text on a page and create a note with it that will have attached a little screenshot of the original page and the link to it. the notes quick search (even the global one with F2) finds even words inside the notes. but in the last years, maybe because Vivaldi added more integrations to it, I became massively addicted. Vivaldi will never become like the old Opera, it's impossible, Chromium works in a different way, but they are trying really hard to make it as similar as possible, if not better in some functionalities.Ĭlick to expand.With Opera I was almost ignoring that feature, except for some fast copy/past I wasn't able to see the actual potential. required many months to see some "basic" Opera functionalities appear, but they kept working hard on it, they started to include many customizations, and THEN I realized it was actually happening, it was really becoming different from the other browsers, like Opera was. pretty much a base Chromium with a different, and little ugly for me, interface. another good project is OtterBrowser, that is made by a developer that really "knows" what was missed after the death of Opera, but it's almost a one-man work and will require a lot of time to see something "complete". So I started to follow the development of the new Opera, that is still very clean and fast, even faster for the GX version, but lacks customizations and many functionalities (that must be added with plugins). ![]() maybe only Firefox with at least 24 plugins, and still felt incomplete. there was absolutely no browser around comparable. even I criticized the inclusion of Vivaldia and I wasn't so sure that an integrated adblock was a good idea, but then turned out that they managed those things in a good way.Īlso, I always try different same products for months before choosing "the only one" to use. It's not a war, everyone has their own preferences, but for example expressed an opinion that I thought myself many months ago. ![]() Vivaldi (the "real" spiritual successor to Opera) is using Chromium as a base, but they are doing an incredible job at making it (hugely) customizable and light, and they are also reintroducing some unexpected functionality of the old Opera.Įven if it has compatibility to Chrome Plugins, I don't need them, because the browser has already all the advanced functionalities I possibly need, like with the old Opera. then I tried Opera, and not only was way faster, but I was able to do the same stuff without adding anything. I used Firefox for many years, from the first Beta to version 3, and after they added the plugins system I needed a lots of them, that made the browser fat and slow. at some point this became massive and almost impossible to maintain. so they started to send as updates CSS and UserJS that were used by the browser to "correct" the "broken" websites layout in realtime. Opera was the most customizable browser I ever seen, it failed because was sticking to the standards, they wanted the engine clean, but most sites (with IE, Chrome or mozilla tags) obviously had issues. are you referring to the fact that websites suck ? Click to expand.I can't understand the meaning of this phrase. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |